Jump to content

makojunki

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by makojunki

  1. makojunki
    no need to be modest here, Jedi xD
  2. makojunki
    so kinda like this ^
  3. makojunki
    ok thanks. i was fairly sure it wasnt gonna be a QcK and lightweight mouse
  4. makojunki
    what mouse, mouse feet, and pad are u using for this?
  5. makojunki
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Mouse_acceleration this is what i use for disabling mouse accel in Manjaro. should be same 'idea' in other distros.... create and edit a file in ---> /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-mouse-acceleration.conf Necro coz i was looking for this answer too.
  6. makojunki
    https://www.omnicalculator.com/math/arc-length this is the site i used for the calc, in case you were interested
  7. makojunki
    ah, yes. i see how it is the same as the radius now xD many thanks for the reply
  8. makojunki
    Could someone tell me how, maybe a formula, I would find the distance 'Z' given a chord length 'C' and central angle. Many thanks.
  9. makojunki
    i have the opposite issue.... low zoom feels fine, high zoom feels too fast (using 0% monitor distance).
  10. makojunki
    I am currently using 84% in BF4, for no real reason, but it feels acceptable. Ill try 88.9% thanks for the infos.
  11. makojunki
    ok many thanks for the time and infos
  12. makojunki
    So is there a mathematically viable coefficient that sits between 0% MDV and 100% MDV. The reason I ask, is because 0% MDV (although feels great when getting used to it) sometimes feels too slow, and 100% MDV sometimes feels too fast using scopes. Is there a recommended MDV between 0% and 100% that uses a known rationale? Thanks
  13. makojunki
    Hi, Is there a list of any other mathematical alternatives to Monitor Distance Coefficients of 0%, 100%, 133%, 178%? Ive seen some mentioning of 56.25%, but is that vertical or horizontal? Are there any other monitor coefficients that can be considered, while also being backed up by a mathematical rationale such as gear ratios etc.... I would be very appreciative if a list could be made with a quick explanation as to how the figure is derived. Many thanks.
  14. makojunki
    in a game like CSGo go ahead, use accel. You're alwasy aiming at standard, known points of interest and angles that never change ie doors, windows, edges of walls that you play consistently time and again. Other than that, mouse accel is not something that should be promoted. I really don't think mentioning anybody gives any more justification, you're just name dropping. Regardless, I stand by what I said... accel is a niche topic and irrelevant to 99% of the playerbase.
  15. makojunki
    sorry, i was replying to ikinson but i guess i didnt quote it.
  16. makojunki
    i would advise you not to use mouse accel software tbh. u will destroy your aim. It's a niche topic and irrelevant except for a very small minority of players
  17. makojunki
    The monitor distance NEVER affects hipfire. it does not affect hipfire. it only affects you when u change your FOV, when scoping, using a red dot etc. Basically anything that lowers your FOV will be affected by the coefficient. But, your hipfire will never be affected because hipfire sens is what the coefficient is based upon in the first place. Example... you could play a 30cm hipfire using 0% or 178%, but your hipfire will ALWAYS stay at 30cm. only the scoping will be affected by the 0% or 178% coefficient
  18. makojunki
    I use 90 horizontal (4:3) 106.26 horizontal (16:9) in both games. I had a feeling it was due to the different scenery and how CSGO feels more cramped compared to BF4. Fostbite 3 is a fine engine, even compared to titles in 2021 the game still looks good, and runs well. I just meant it like, it was old. CSGO keeps getting updated compared to BF4. Still, i was just curious as to why the same distance in hipfire felt faster / more responsive in CSGO compared to BF4... and like u said, it's probs due to the maps and the scenery such as character model sizes and doors etc.
  19. makojunki
    If i match CSGO hipfire to BF4 hipfire, CSGO always 'feels' faster and BF4 always 'feels' slower. I'm using same distance across both games, and same hipfire FOV across both games. Is there a reason for this plz? Maybe because i get more FPS in csgo? maybe because the BF4 game engine is trash? IDK, was just wondering if anyone else found the same and maybe know why. Thanks
  20. makojunki
    I just discovered that each particular server needs to support this functionality. So, while it is possible to set sens per scope, the server itself must also be running the mod which allows it
  21. makojunki
    Could you please explain how I should use the settings options in VU and also the Mouse Sens site, to calc for 0% MDV with a Scale of 67% (basically USA on, 67% ads, from BF4) many thanks. @DPI Wizard https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/?share=9612e61d18e85dc993e878279197ae53
  22. makojunki
    bro thanks so much. it feels like my mouse grip is super consistent with hipfire and ads now, in both BF4 and CSGO when going from hipfire to scope. thank you so much, ur a legend. @DPI Wizard
  23. makojunki
    @DPI Wizard haha, ur a fucking legend. its feels really good. using 100% Monitor now from now on. thanks a lot Sir Wizard. EDIT: Sensei Wizard xD
  24. makojunki
    ok i try it. thanks
  25. makojunki
    so, u think i should INCREASE the coefficent?
×
×
  • Create New...