fortunate reee

at the bottom of the calculatr it shows you which number matches which what in agme number (dependingon whether you use either in game or game file )

the cpu bug (if we are speaking of stuttering as in 100%cpu bug which is a known issue in siege especially on intel chips i7 7700k 8700k etc *which to this day hasnt been fixed* ) is more siege related than it has to do with a single setting (2 links if you want to read ) the raw input thing in question has been fixed in the last patch ---- if any of you notice cpu based sturreing id suggest using a limiter like rtss to cap your fps slightly above your monitors hz 144hz = 160fps cap in my experience this gets rid of must stutters in games liek apex / siege at no significant input lag ---- on another note if you arent noticing stutters / issues there generally is no need to witchhunt potential bugs the whole windows optimisation stuff going around is 90% bogus

dpi variation , lod/ pad differences affecting dpi , mouse weight,shape placebo are potential factors. it is pretty common to have initial differences in feel when swapping hardware nothing out of the ordinary

the concept of muscle memory that many "gamers" falsely belive in is pretty wrong. if you played games / used aim training for a long time you dont really bat an eye after swapping your values within reasonable bounds matching sens/ values as well as fov can make life easier but i wouldnt call it anywhere close to necessary to be a good aimer

try both use what works really not important

use the share link , so we can simply adjust your settings for you instead of having to copy everything if you plan on using the fov you set in game you have to set this to in game aswell -- you dont need to use hipfire to ALL simply using the all option on the upper game is enough if your native language is supported i highly suggest reading the instructions --- the reason the calculator gives you the same number for all scopes is that this is considered to be 1:1 sens this is only the case in apex legends and some other games that use focal length / 0% match as their default

smth like this

https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/forums/topic/6396-instructions/

pretty much jsut had to do what i showed you above https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/?share=bbd4c9eb29172ae450d5c74d7affed9c this will get you pretty close

the colour of the number is an indicator for how far off the number generated is from the number it shoudl be depending on what you have set up here ^^ (spoiler warning both val and destiny use monitor distance horizontal 100 or mdh 100) if you want to have one number each you could set it up accordingly -- id suggest using this if you want to match valorant (due to the fact that destiny 2s fov is tiny this will get you the closest to val without much effort) generally suggest using the share function so we can help you without having to fiddle aroudn needlessly

distance isnt a meassurement of speed ----------------------------- if you share what you have done its easier for others to help you ---- if there is zoom involved ( ie most ads or scope options ) 360 distance isnt the way to go all of thsi plus the reasoning behind it, as welll as a proper set of instructions can be found on the left hand sde of your screen

unless they finally changed that mechanic , the game might still use randomised values based on scope / weight and other factors last time i checked you could do 1 scope at best ( with far too much effort involved)

if you want the best possible experience in both games id sugest trying to either chane your warzone coefficient to 0.00 while match the fov accordingly https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/?share=ed1c178fd4bd0550204b47617a375 aad using all conversion like this ( my preference ) or if you prefer sticking to 1.333 changing the multiplier used by the calculator in order to properly match https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/?share=80a9e1f29f3864035c09b3eadf05d9bd in this case you could / would have to decide to use 1 out of 2 possible values for one of the multipliers used by apex since there is an overlap in the multipliers used by different zoom levels whenever i used 1.33 i tended to just use the average of both numbers for that multiplier trying tohave both fit "slightly" (1X Scope / ADS (SMG, SG, Pistol)) and (ADS (AR, LMG, Sniper))

its in the recent patchnotes so it shoudl be fixed with the next patch

https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/forums/topic/7663-r6s-to-apex-sens-conversion/?do=findComment&comment=37637&_rid=26011

search for "Conversion setup" you just have to set it up according to your wishes - the reason it shows you all 1.0 and 50 is that that is considered 1:1 sens (not distance) ie a 0% match but that is all explained in the instructions

https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/?share=fb11ee503aa64a327e00798d0dc4c918

its great that you stand by what you say , its jsut unfortunate that you based your oppinions on your missconceptions the reason why i "name dropped " in this instance was merely to show you that your stance on accel isnt shared by many leading memebers of the aim training communities. ( in case youd actually were interested in basing your arguments on facts next time it would have been helpfull for you to have a name / place to start looking for some info) id highly suggest actually investing some time into reading or actually trying good accel before spewing all this nonsense about things you obviously havent tried . ------------ similar to this post of yours that left room for improvement the things you have said so far were either simply wrong or merely ill researched , that isnt something i could or would blame you for since the topic can be quite the rabbit hole to get in to however ill gladly help to inform /correct you whenever i notice room for improvement. no need to spread missinformation

there is no 1 "godsense" but given your sens range id suggest trying out raw accel https://www.kovaak.com/mouse-acceleration/ pretty much the only way to combine both advatages of high and low sense there is a discord dedicated to raw accel https://discord.gg/khGupWe9cV if you are willing to go against popular uninformed bullshit theory about "hurr durr accel bad" then you might be positiveely suprised as far as ads sens gooes i mostly stick to 0% / focal lenght match

the issue with "i need to flick to the same spot " thing is that in reality you dont always need to move the same distance especially in a game like apex which is mostly tracking focussed there is no perfect solution to aim (fiven the human factor)0% jsut makes the most sense. your gameplay shouldnt be centered on flicks (while they look flashy they are more of a sign of bad mechanics , lack of tracking awareness or crosshair placement ) yes its smart to use whatever suits you the best i dont think that it would be wise to center your whole ads sens on flicking if that was your plan contrary to the whole belief system built around guys like shroud etc good aim doesnt have to look flashy cant argue with that part i recently tried using 100mdh at 80% scale due to a bit of a destiny 2 phase and while it worked nice initially you quickly notice the lack of actual uniformity (especially in hectic situatuions) ill stick to 0% + raw accel for now since that is my current ideal setup

ironically enough this being the exact situation in which accel comes in handy

read again you missread or missinterpreted what i said above obviously those 2 can and will impact your hipfire distance ( when in use / used correctly ) lets say we are using this while trying to achieve a desktop to game conversion https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/?share=37e9254b63afa43d3e5e59bc5a843444 you will see which multiplier is used in this case by the blue outline in this case changeing the windows / 2d number will infact affect the sens you will receive same thign goes for hipfire to hipfire coversions if you dont match your res/ fov to match beforehand https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/?share=5f085bbac4e4e152e56243017a110d53 similiar to this in which case hipfire will imapct the distance / sensthe calc will give you if you actually want to have the same hipfire 360 distance similar to what you stated beforehand youd have to go with somethign like this https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/?share=01b80edae9b966449c19357f9daaadad in which case hipfire obviously woudlnt be scaled to any other factor besides 1:1 distance --- if you have more questions in regards to this or accel please check the instructions / the accel link i sent before since those should clear out any other misconceptions you might have

simply wrong there is no actual evidience that would prove that accel ( when applied correctly would do any harm ie a logical accel curve unlike windowds) thinking about the fact that koovak ( the creator of the best aim training software out there is one of the major backers of the most commonly used standalone accel tools out there should be a great hint to that as well ) tbf there actually is more scientific research against the whole use "muscle memory" argument than there is research backing " using a single sens"

essentially same at 0% you dotn have to worry about mdh or mdv

share what you have done and what you want you want