Leaderboard

I didn't get in on the beta, but I will add it as soon as I get access!

The concept of this method goes as this: Your wrists', swivel at the base of the wrist left and right. swiveling the wrist to the left is radial deviation. swiveling the wrist to the right is ulnar deviation. The wrist's degrees of ulnar and radial deviation is: 19 degrees of radial deviation, 33 degrees of ulnar deviation You want to be neutral as possible, as its going to be the spot you can use as a point of reference, as it's easier to learn, and it will become the foundation of your calculations. If you used ulnar deviation, as your basis for doing your aiming arc, mirroring it, you will have issues when you go past the 19 degrees of radial deviation. You solve this, with optimising your 360 with radial deviation. When you do this method, from neutral position, as listed in the photo. You will take from the tip of the finger, and move it to the limit of radial deviation. This will be your 180 deg of 360 sens, and mirroring it will complete the 360 deg. Since everyone's hand size is different, the arc length from neutral to radial deviation will be different. The distance that you are looking for is the distance from the green dot on the protractor, to the blue dot. This requires everyone's cm/360 to be completely unique! This method, makes everyone's method of aiming inherently flawed, since 99% of most sens will not fit within your limits of kinesiology. This method uses kinesiology, or basic science of wrist joint movement to maximize what you can move. Note: I do however realize that the sensor is not located at the tip of the finger with most mouses, but listed below. You can make it slightly more accurate if you know the distance of the sensor to base of wrist and calculate the arc length of limit of radial deviation. but the way you hold your mouse can alter this entirely, but there's too many variables, but the variable you can isolate is 19 degrees of radial deviation.