Leaderboard

Preferably on, but the settings depend on what you have in PUBG.

Snug as a Bug on a Drug!

There are other options but doubt you'd want to use them: have a secondary sensitivity, using a DPI adjustment on your mouse, for quickly checking spots; or use acceleration

Yeah, when you zoom in, targets end up moving faster so it may seem like you should use a faster coefficient but it won't help you in the long run. You just need to move your arm faster to match the changed speed. Targets move slower at higher FOV and faster at lower FOV. This very process is the reason why I use 0%MM/coefficient. DPIWizard made a video demonstrating just how in sync your sensitivity can be while tracking, with 0%. You don't even need to worry about the FOV, you naturally adjust to target speed. If this is a problem you have I would definitely recommend using it. The ADS may feel slower, but it's only slower relative to a higher FOV. 0% actually converts sensitivity much higher than other methods. Try playing on 130 FOV with 0% and you'll see how fast it is... and yet you still have that precision and tracking advantage which is so nice.

The thing is, the higher the coefficient value, the faster the zoom will feel in relation to a higher matched FOV, so that's why 177% feels faster than 133% when zooming. But of course a FOV is going to feel too slow if it is too low. This one situation should not determine which coefficient you use - if it's too slow then you probably should avoid using the weapon in that particular situation because you really don't need its extra magnification. Use it only if your target is far away enough. Instead, you should pick a coefficient based on its advantages: 0%MM has better precision at the crosshair, 100%MM (177%) has better overall muscle memory (but worse precision at the crosshair), and everything else leans more towards precision or more towards better overall muscle memory. Though, keep in mind you can go above 100%MM... At this point, what you define as "100%" becomes arbitrary and dependent on your monitor size/sitting distance. We've actually been discussing this in another forum. It's probably a better idea to think in angles rather than distance on the screen due to the concept of perceived size, i.e. you want to match your sensitivity to a point on your monitor of the same visual angle instead of the same percentage of monitor distance.