MDH 0% or 100%

[Rykrow]

I have always used 0% MDH, but I have seen many games use 100% (PUBG, Fornite, Destiny 2, Valorant, Splitgate, Back 4 blood). What would you do, keep using 0% or change to 100% and get used to it. What I dont like of 0% is that, in those games I have to chose a sensitivity for one zoom level and if I use another weapon with different zoom level it wont match 0%, otherwise 100% will always match with all zoom levels. I hope I explained well...

[ProuDBeasT]

I had the same issue and decided to switch to MDH 100% about a year ago and I'm doing just fine, I just had to get used to it because it felt too fast at first (aim training using ADS FOV and sens in some scenarios might have helped).

Upsides: I can switch seamlessly between all the games where I can set MDH 100% (which are almost all these days). Downsides: getting used to MDH 100% might be a bit annoying for the first few days.

Switching to MDH 100% was also how I was convinced that aim is all about hand-eye coordination and one of the consequences of that is that you can get used to basically any hipfire to ADS conversion.

[fortunate reee]

53 minutes ago, ProuDBeasT said:

all about hand-eye coordination and one of the consequences of that is that you can get used to basically any hipfire to ADS conversion.

this tbh i jsut stick to 0% and live with the eventual discrepancies in the cases where i can only use one value liek destiny etc

at this point 0% feels to comfortable not to use and the rest is just a matter of warming up

if one has a harder time switching between different sens i can see how that would be advantageous

Edited August 6, 2021 by fortunate reee

[Pyroxia]

13 hours ago, Rykrow said:

I have always used 0% MDH, but I have seen many games use 100% (PUBG, Fornite, Destiny 2, Valorant, Splitgate, Back 4 blood). What would you do, keep using 0% or change to 100% and get used to it. What I dont like of 0% is that, in those games I have to chose a sensitivity for one zoom level and if I use another weapon with different zoom level it wont match 0%, otherwise 100% will always match with all zoom levels. I hope I explained well...

I would recommend everyone comparing %100 mdh and %0 MDV in quake champions. Try each of them 3 days. Play with just LG. Highest accuracy wins!

[Rykrow]

Thanks all for answering. I have a doubt, at 100% MDH, sensitivity will be faster at higher zoom levels, right?

[Pyroxia]

Just now, Rykrow said:

Thanks all for answering. I have a doubt, at 100% MDH, sensitivity will be faster at higher zoom levels, right?

right its faster

[popnik90]

Pyroxia, what is more accurate in your tests in qc?   mdh 100% or MDV 0% ?

Edited August 16, 2021 by popnik90

[Merinda18]

4 hours ago, popnik90 said:

Pyroxia, what is more accurate in your tests in qc?   mdh 100% or MDV 0% ?

100% for sure

[MacSquirrel_Jedi]

On 8/6/2021 at 10:42 AM, Rykrow said:

keep using 0% or change to 100%

Hello guys,

neither one  i think i found so far the best method from Windows to game conversion ! It lies between 0% and 100% and it's changing depending on ingame FOV. It has much better results that 0% or 100%. The principle is simple, I can find the smallest possible deviation for all monitor distances ! For now it's not in my power to create formula for it. So i just created 10 000 distances (from center to edge of screen) in excel. For each monitor distance i receive a deviation from Windows at same mouse distance. And now i'm manually tuning sensitivity until the sum of all these deviations is as small as possible  

This method will also find the smallest possible deviation between Hipfire and Scopes. Something you will never achieve with 0% or 100%.

I will try to implement it to my utility in future. Now i want to focus to add aims to PUBG and ApexL.

[fortunate reee]

1 hour ago, Merinda18 said:

or sure

 

14 minutes ago, MacSquirrel_Jedi said:

neither one

both are perfectly accurate for what they are supposed to do so i dont see a point in asking about their "accuracy " its the wrong term

if we are speaking of preference both arguments can be made

[MacSquirrel_Jedi]

5 minutes ago, fortunate reee said:

both are perfectly accurate for what they are supposed to do

Of course they are. But my answer is not related to just one point on screen but to all points !

[Pyroxia]

6 hours ago, popnik90 said:

Pyroxia, what is more accurate in your tests in qc?   mdh 100% or MDV 0% ?

%0 works amazing in Overwatch %100 mdh works well on quake champions. This is my opinion thats why I recommend everyone to try which is best. I change my method so much and I'm not good player so don't mind me.

Edited August 16, 2021 by Pyroxia

[Pyroxia]

42 minutes ago, MacSquirrel_Jedi said:

Hello guys,

neither one  i think i found so far the best method from Windows to game conversion ! It lies between 0% and 100% and it's changing depending on ingame FOV. It has much better results that 0% or 100%. The principle is simple, I can find the smallest possible deviation for all monitor distances ! For now it's not in my power to create formula for it. So i just created 10 000 distances (from center to edge of screen) in excel. For each monitor distance i receive a deviation from Windows at same mouse distance. And now i'm manually tuning sensitivity until the sum of all these deviations is as small as possible  

This method will also find the smallest possible deviation between Hipfire and Scopes. Something you will never achieve with 0% or 100%.

I will try to implement it to my utility in future. Now i want to focus to add aims to PUBG and ApexL.

If ur method integrated in any calculator I'd use it until then I can't try ur method but if I remember correctly u said deviation is less with %100mdv on 1920x1080. I'll respect any method since I used viewspeed vertical and can say it feels different than mdh %70 for me. Nowadays I'm changing between %100-180MDH from windows. Also tried accel for a while and I can say it's not that scary works well in some situations.

[Pyroxia]

%0 Tracking in apex 

 

%100 Tracking in apex first minutes of video 

 

 

Edited August 16, 2021 by Pyroxia

[fortunate reee]

17 hours ago, Pyroxia said:

method integrated in any calculator

this tbh