500hz or 1000hz on 60hz monitors

[fanatycme]

Which one?

[conan1]

With newer mice i would say 1000.

500 belongs to the past.

Exceptions always exist in older games.

It doesn't really matter. I always set maximum, and if something going wrong with mouse pointer, then I start decreasing. But as long as you have good mouse and good mousepad, that should not happen.

Maybe you'd rather think about more HZ at the monitor than with your mouse.

best regards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited July 12, 2017 by conan1

[Drimzi]

Edited January 28, 2018 by Drimzi

[fanatycme]

33 minutes ago, Drimzi said:

The screen refresh rate only makes the mouse lag apparent or not, the lag is still there no matter what refresh rate you have. If your mouse and game has no issues at 1000hz, use that. There is zero benefit in increasing your mouse lag.

Thanks, I see your point, the difference in polling rate on 60hz is only visually, it will not look as smooth as 144hz, but the rest, lag and so on will be the same right?

[fanatycme]

2 hours ago, conan1 said:

With newer mice i would say 1000.

500 belongs to the past.

Exceptions always exist in older games.

It doesn't really matter. I always set maximum, and if something going wrong with mouse pointer, then I start decreasing. But as long as you have good mouse and good mousepad, that should not happen.

Maybe you'd rather think about more HZ at the monitor than with your mouse.

best regards

 

 

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

[Drimzi]

Edited January 28, 2018 by Drimzi

[fanatycme]

29 minutes ago, Drimzi said:

Yep exactly. It's the same with another question you had with DPI, more is better as long as you keep the overall sensitivity the same and there are no errors. Using 4/11 or 3/11 WPS is an easy way to use a more beneficial DPI in the games that support raw input.

but how much is good for 1024x768? should i go for the highest value?, my mouse can go 400/800/1600/3200 (all are native dpi), isnt 3200dpi too much for 1024x768?

Edited July 13, 2017 by fanatycme