Jump to content

Not being able to find the right sensitivity for any game.


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/12/2019 at 20:52, fortunate reee said:

havent played the newest cod but there is a thread in which dpi wizzard talks about what to use in cod, as long as the calculator at 0% gives you these results they should be aok

Thanks for all the help but nothing has changed even with the psa method and doing all the calculations etc etc. Idk what the problem is to be honest :(

Posted (edited)
On 16/12/2019 at 21:30, TGGE said:

Thanks for all the help but nothing has changed even with the psa method and doing all the calculations etc etc. Idk what the problem is to be honest :(

i gave the cod a try on a friends acc and must say that it is not very rewarding when it comes to having skill (aim) 

-console aim assist that gets close to actual aimbot 

-scorestreaks rewarding sitting in a corner on top of a roof with a claymore 

and many other factors .

 

all in all i can only recommend sticking to a value you found through the psa method or just started liking whilst playing (feeling good is important)

then converting that through either 0% [personally cant do 0%hipfire just doesn't work well for me without matching the exact fov ]

360 for hipfire and sticking to 0% for ads and scopes seems to work the most uniform for me with  [68.43 vdeg /100.8 hor fov ]

dont actually use aimtrainers alot these days since i have reached  a point at which i have used most general values image.png.c493a7784dde55e057f7619168df9d2c.png

personally doing very well with this setup , i recently went back down to 500hz polling rate and it feels decent

 

 

Edited by fortunate reee
Posted

 

 

3 hours ago, fortunate reee said:

i gave the cod a try on a friends acc and must say that it is not very rewarding when it comes to having skill (aim) 

-console aim assist that gets close to actual aimbot 

-scorestreaks rewarding sitting in a corner on top of a roof with a claymore 

and many other factors .

 

all in all i can only recommend sticking to a value you found through the psa method or just started liking whilst playing (feeling good is important)

then converting that through either 0% [personally cant do 0%hipfire just doesn't work well for me without matching the exact fov ]

360 for hipfire and sticking to 0% for ads and scopes seems to work the most uniform for me with  [68.43 vdeg /100.8 hor fov ]

dont actually use aimtrainers alot these days since i have reached  a point at which i have used most general values image.png.c493a7784dde55e057f7619168df9d2c.png

personally doing very well with this setup , i recently went back down to 500hz polling rate and it feels decent

Also what was we doing out of all the 3 different ways to convert it like 0% hipfire etc etc.

 

 

first question is. But isnt a lower polling rate worse than a high polling rate?

also

Posted
6 hours ago, fortunate reee said:

i gave the cod a try on a friends acc and must say that it is not very rewarding when it comes to having skill (aim) 

-console aim assist that gets close to actual aimbot 

-scorestreaks rewarding sitting in a corner on top of a roof with a claymore 

and many other factors .

 

all in all i can only recommend sticking to a value you found through the psa method or just started liking whilst playing (feeling good is important)

then converting that through either 0% [personally cant do 0%hipfire just doesn't work well for me without matching the exact fov ]

360 for hipfire and sticking to 0% for ads and scopes seems to work the most uniform for me with  [68.43 vdeg /100.8 hor fov ]

dont actually use aimtrainers alot these days since i have reached  a point at which i have used most general values image.png.c493a7784dde55e057f7619168df9d2c.png

personally doing very well with this setup , i recently went back down to 500hz polling rate and it feels decent

 

 

What would you do about the multiplier? like do I copy this over to the game as well?

 

1041004792_overwatchtocod.PNG.9052d2f98c832a2ec96467d0f9d835eb.PNG

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, TGGE said:

What would you do about the multiplier? like do I copy this over to the game as well?

 

1041004792_overwatchtocod.PNG.9052d2f98c832a2ec96467d0f9d835eb.PNG

 

in regards to the 500hz vs 1000hz , the difference between those two is almost insignificant should not feel  a performance difference besides of placebo (1/2 ms ) and i like describing 1000hz as "over responsive" or rather 500hz as smoother (seems to not pick up needless movements) some games / office versions really don't like high polling rates 

so that somewhat is another benefit 

 

i generally prefer using the same fov (or at least the closest possible fov for a similar experience) ik there is a lot of praise for cranking it up all the way but i and i guess many others tend to perform better on on lower fovs .could try fov 103 for a while  

Posted
4 minutes ago, fortunate reee said:

in regards to the 500hz vs 1000hz , the difference between those two is almost insignificant should not feel  a performance difference besides of placebo (1/2 ms ) and i like describing 1000hz as "over responsive" or rather 500hz as smoother (seems to not pick up needless movements) some games / office versions really don't like high polling rates 

so that somewhat is another benefit 

 

i generally prefer using the same fov (or at least the closest possible fov for a similar experience) ik there is a lot of praise for cranking it up all the way but i and i guess many others tend to perform better on on lower fovs .could try fov 103 for a while  

Yeah I could I just like 120 fov haha. But in the newest cod it does not feel like 120 fov haha I have like 100 FOV in minecraft.

 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, fortunate reee said:

i gave the cod a try on a friends acc and must say that it is not very rewarding when it comes to having skill (aim) 

-console aim assist that gets close to actual aimbot 

-scorestreaks rewarding sitting in a corner on top of a roof with a claymore 

and many other factors .

 

all in all i can only recommend sticking to a value you found through the psa method or just started liking whilst playing (feeling good is important)

then converting that through either 0% [personally cant do 0%hipfire just doesn't work well for me without matching the exact fov ]

360 for hipfire and sticking to 0% for ads and scopes seems to work the most uniform for me with  [68.43 vdeg /100.8 hor fov ]

dont actually use aimtrainers alot these days since i have reached  a point at which i have used most general values image.png.c493a7784dde55e057f7619168df9d2c.png

personally doing very well with this setup , i recently went back down to 500hz polling rate and it feels decent

 

 

 

Edited by TGGE
Posted
6 hours ago, fortunate reee said:

i gave the cod a try on a friends acc and must say that it is not very rewarding when it comes to having skill (aim) 

-console aim assist that gets close to actual aimbot 

-scorestreaks rewarding sitting in a corner on top of a roof with a claymore 

and many other factors .

 

all in all i can only recommend sticking to a value you found through the psa method or just started liking whilst playing (feeling good is important)

then converting that through either 0% [personally cant do 0%hipfire just doesn't work well for me without matching the exact fov ]

360 for hipfire and sticking to 0% for ads and scopes seems to work the most uniform for me with  [68.43 vdeg /100.8 hor fov ]

dont actually use aimtrainers alot these days since i have reached  a point at which i have used most general values image.png.c493a7784dde55e057f7619168df9d2c.png

personally doing very well with this setup , i recently went back down to 500hz polling rate and it feels decent

 

 

Also as another question would you recommend I play another cod/FPS? and the only concern I have of going back to older call of dutys is that the "better players" wont be on the game so I wont know if I am doing well because of my aim or because the players are just bad.

Posted
Just now, TGGE said:

Also as another question would you recommend I play another cod/FPS? and the only concern I have of going back to older call of dutys is that the "better players" wont be on the game so I wont know if I am doing well because of my aim or because the players are just bad.

could try apex legends since its f2p if you want more aim and less sliding around

Posted
5 minutes ago, fortunate reee said:

could try apex legends since its f2p if you want more aim and less sliding around

It is more of the question you was talking about cod being really slow etc etc and it is hard to find people. So I didnt know if it would of been better to just play another game where I can get in a couple of 1v1 more easier rather than getting shot by a guy in the corner.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Pyroxia said:

Try %0mm windows to game. I'm using 28.5 cm on cs go and I think its fine. 

What is the difference between that and what I have done?

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, TGGE said:

What is the difference between that and what I have done?

the difference is that you dont start based on 1 games sense and instead start with your windows cursor 

image.thumb.png.9837535a8a4e343b312fb54113441a9e.png

Edited by fortunate reee
Posted
5 minutes ago, fortunate reee said:

the difference is that you dont start based on 1 games sense and instead start with your windows cursor 

image.thumb.png.9837535a8a4e343b312fb54113441a9e.png

sorry to be a pain but I am guessing there is no best sensitivity/way to do all of this xD

Posted
8 minutes ago, TGGE said:

sorry to be a pain but I am guessing there is no best sensitivity/way to do all of this xD

i somewhat like the psa but obviously the windows method makes sense too if you got a dpi that feels good for your desktop why not have it in game might be worth a try  

Posted
3 minutes ago, fortunate reee said:

i somewhat like the psa but obviously the windows method makes sense too if you got a dpi that feels good for your desktop why not have it in game might be worth a try  

 

Well to be fair I have done the PSA method 1/2 times is it a good idea to get a good nights rest and makes sure your feeling good and do the PSA method 3days in a row because from the video you linked I am pretty sure the guy said to do it  every 2 weeks for 3 times or so.

Posted
40 minutes ago, fortunate reee said:

i somewhat like the psa but obviously the windows method makes sense too if you got a dpi that feels good for your desktop why not have it in game might be worth a try  

Also not to sound weird or anything but I converted my call of duty sens to minecraft with a FOV of 100 and it feels super smooth in minecraft so Idk if that could help at all xD

Posted
2 minutes ago, TGGE said:

Also not to sound weird or anything but I converted my call of duty sens to minecraft with a FOV of 100 and it feels super smooth in minecraft so Idk if that could help at all xD

some games work better with 0% than others 

Posted
1 minute ago, fortunate reee said:

some games work better with 0% than others 

Honestly dont know what to do now about cod xD anything you would recommend?

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, TGGE said:

Honestly dont know what to do now about cod xD anything you would recommend?

experiment with a different fov , try out other settings ,play a game that supports skill instead of sitting in a corner with a clay

Edited by fortunate reee
Posted
16 minutes ago, fortunate reee said:

what dpi / wps do you use with that i keep getting plenty of  discrepancy on some games  

Sorry thought you was talking to me xD

Posted
Just now, fortunate reee said:

just curious about his setup since i didnt like it much when i used it , always trying to learn 

Yeah fair enough I am trying to learn/find the best sensitivity for me along the way honestly. But I am willing to try everything. :

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...