Jump to content

Quake Champions Zoom


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey, when calculating the zoom sensitivity multiplier for quake champions, they added an option that is along the lines of "automatically scale zoom by change in focal length" basically making it so that it automatically converts using mm0%, my question is, do i have to change the zoom sensitivity from 1 down to 0.83 or do i just leave it at 1? 

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Wizard
Posted
Just now, YungTrapperZoj said:

Hey, when calculating the zoom sensitivity multiplier for quake champions, they added an option that is along the lines of "automatically scale zoom by change in focal length" basically making it so that it automatically converts using mm0%, my question is, do i have to change the zoom sensitivity from 1 down to 0.83 or do i just leave it at 1? 

Quake Champions zoom sensitivity has always been off compared to a regular mathematical scale. So I need to (painstakingly) analyze this and see exactly what it does. It might be as simple as your suggestion though, but I'll check it to be sure and add it as a Special Option to the game.

  • Wizard
Posted

For reference, this is what the Quake Champions zoom sensitivity looks like (or at least used to look like).

The orange line is a regular MDH scaling closest to what the game does, while the blue line is how the game actually scales.

image.png

(FOV on the bottom, counts on the left)

Posted (edited)

Pretty sure they were using a look up table, with hard coded multipliers for each fov. According to recent patch notes, they changed it to have a toggle for 0% mm, or no scaling at all, with a simple multiplier similar to overwatch.

The whole system should be the same as KovaaKs.

Edited by Drimzi
  • Wizard
Posted
Just now, Drimzi said:

Pretty sure they were using a look up table, with hard coded multipliers for each fov. According to recent patch notes, they changed it to have a toggle for 0% mm, or no scaling at all, with a simple multiplier similar to overwatch.

I'll check the FOV's tomorrow and see if anything changed. Looking back at the original analysis, it's pretty obvious when graphed that it had one scaling for <100 to 110, one for 110-130 and a final one for 130+. I found 59% MDH to be the best average, but can't quite recall if I analyzed each step of the scaling.

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...